Newsletter Sign Up

StopAfib.org

Newsletter Signup
Get in Rhythm. Stay in Rhythm.™ View Replays from Atrial Fibrillation Patient Conference Aug 4-6, 2017, in Dallas, TX
Get in Rhythm. Stay in Rhythm.™ View Replays from Atrial Fibrillation Patient Conference Aug 4-6, 2017, in Dallas, TX

Home Anticoagulation Monitoring Is An Effective Alternative to Coumadin Clinics

VA Study Finds Home INR Testing Effective, Though Not Superior

November 17, 2008 8:47 AM CT

In a study funded by the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, VA hospital patients on warfarin for atrial fibrillation or mechanical heart valves were tracked and home anticoagulation monitoring was found to be every bit as effective as INR (International Normalized Ratio) testing in the hospital clinic.

Patients were followed for an average of three years. In that time, 7.9% of home monitoring patients had experienced a stroke, a major bleed, or death as compared to 8.9% of those tested in the clinic.

Thus, home monitoring can be considered to be an effective alternative for those who are disabled or must travel long distances to reach a clinic and are deemed able to perform home testing.

Read:  Home monitoring is as safe as clinic testing for patients on blood thinner, but not superior

Earlier this year, Medicare announced coverage for home testing, which opened the door for widespread coverage by insurance companies.

Read more:  Medicare Announces Expanded Coverage For Warfarin Patients Monitoring Clotting Time At Home

Back to News

Last Modified November 17, 2008

Get Started Learning About Atrial Fibrillation

Afib Community

Blog Forum

Locate Help

Afib services near you

USA Locations International Locations List Your Afib Services

We comply with the HONcode standard for trustworthy health information: verify here.

Newsletter Sign Up